Confessions of a Litigious Mind

The random, irrelevant musings of a law school graduate.

Friday, January 12, 2007

best case language ever?

"specifically, the supervisor, . . . , (i) hired and fired the boners, (ii) set their hours, and, (iii). . . paid the boners for their work."

zheng v. liberty apparel co (355 f.3d 61), citing rutherford food corp. v. mccomb (331 us 722)

posted by josh @ 1/12/2007 04:44:00 PM

6 Comments:

At 1/13/2007 3:36 AM, Blogger angela said...

LMFAO. That's great.

 
At 1/13/2007 8:18 AM, Blogger Damon said...

Just what did they mean by boners? @angela: I can't understand you, I don't know what LMFAO means, and on the last post "could care less" can't be what you meant. No offense, I'm just a dick.

 
At 1/13/2007 10:37 AM, Blogger LawNut said...

LOL.

Best language from a judge I personally witnessed: "aggravated idiocy." There are SO many situations that fit that phrase.

 
At 1/13/2007 12:04 PM, Blogger josh said...

boners refers to meat boners (hahaha), as rutherford food corp v. mccomb is about labor relations at a slaughterhouse

 
At 1/13/2007 12:26 PM, Blogger d$ said...

i like to consider myself a meat boner.

 
At 1/14/2007 2:35 PM, Blogger angela said...

Damon: "LMFAO" stands for "laughing my fucking ass off". And, that probably should've said "couldn't care less" on the the other post. It was a typo.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home